The Villain Canon—Novels, Film Adaptations, and Plays Worth Your Time

Photo by ahmet öktem: https://www.pexels.com/photo/outline-of-a-man-in-a-dark-room-19222036/

This is a follow up to my recent post about redemption stories. As with that post, I’ve just uploaded a YouTube video about villains, aligning each of the four villain story arcs I highlight with a political figure.

Please have a watch and leave me a comment over there, and if you find that I’ve missed a good villain story in the list below, leave it in the comments here.


NOVELS

Hannibal Lecter — Thomas Harris, Red Dragon / The Silence of the Lambs
A forensic psychiatrist and cannibalistic serial killer who is more cultured, more perceptive, and more interesting than almost everyone around him. His compellingness comes entirely from intelligence deployed as predation — he reads people with surgical accuracy and uses that knowledge not to help but to unmake. He operates from a genuine aesthetic philosophy: rudeness is the only offense he cannot forgive.

Amy Dunne — Gillian Flynn, Gone Girl
A villain who weaponizes the performance of femininity itself. Amy understands exactly how women are expected to behave and uses that understanding to construct an alibi so airtight it’s practically a critique of patriarchal assumptions. She’s frightening because she’s right about almost everything she observes, and her rage — however psychopathic its expression — is legible.

Patrick Bateman — Bret Easton Ellis, American Psycho
The horror isn’t whether he’s actually killing anyone — it’s that the novel makes his inner life indistinguishable from the culture around him. His obsessive brand-consciousness and status anxiety are simply the logic of consumer capitalism pushed to its conclusion. He’s a villain who functions as a mirror.

Iago — Shakespeare, Othello
The purest study in motiveless malignancy in the Western canon. What makes Iago terrifying is that his explanations for his own behavior are never quite sufficient — he provides reasons, but they don’t add up to what he does. He seems to destroy for the pleasure of the architecture of destruction itself.

Judge Holden — Cormac McCarthy, Blood Meridian
A seven-foot hairless albino who dances, plays the fiddle, speaks multiple languages, and articulates a coherent philosophy of war as the only honest religion. He is enormous, ageless, and deeply, horribly joyful. McCarthy gives him the best lines and the most intellectual force in the novel, which is the point — violence here isn’t dumb, it’s luminous.

Nurse Ratched — Ken Kesey, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
Her villainy is bureaucratic and therefore nearly impossible to fight. She wields institutional power so smoothly it looks like care. The horror is that she’s not wrong that she’s in charge — she is, completely and legally — and she knows exactly how to make that feel like compassion.

Tom Ripley — Patricia Highsmith, The Talented Mr. Ripley series
A murderer and forger the reader roots for across five novels because Highsmith makes his desire — to belong, to be seen as someone who deserves beautiful things — so achingly familiar. He’s a villain who started as nobody and simply refused to stay there. The immorality is legible; the longing is universal.

Humbert Humbert — Vladimir Nabokov, Lolita
One of literature’s most technically brilliant and morally treacherous villains because the novel is written entirely in his seductive, self-justifying voice. Nabokov buries the truth of what he’s doing under sentences so gorgeous readers have to work to remember what they’re being charmed into forgetting. The discomfort is the point.

Heathcliff — Emily Brontë, Wuthering Heights
A villain shaped entirely by what was done to him — dispossession, racism, class cruelty — who then replaces himself as the instrument of those forces and turns them on everyone around him. His grievance is legitimate. His methods are monstrous. The novel refuses to fully separate the two.

Uriah Heep — Charles Dickens, David Copperfield
The threat of unctuousness as a survival strategy. Heep performs humility to get close enough to steal, and his “umbleness” is a class critique in disguise: he learned that deferring to betters opened more doors than confronting them. He’s a villain produced by a system and operating perfectly within its logic.


NOVEL-TO-FILM ADAPTATIONS

Anton Chigurh — Cormac McCarthy, No Country for Old Men (novel) / Coen Brothers, 2007 (film)
Javier Bardem’s performance finds exactly what McCarthy wrote: a man who has collapsed the distance between himself and fate. He doesn’t want anything personal from his victims; he simply enforces a principle. The coin flip scenes are terrifying because he’s genuinely offering something — the chance that chance will save you — and genuinely means it.

Nurse Ratched — Ken Kesey / Miloš Forman, 1975
Louise Fletcher’s performance strips the character of any cartoonishness. The film Ratched is worse than the novel’s because you can watch her face stay perfectly pleasant while she annihilates someone. The gap between expression and intent is the whole horror.

Alex Delarge — Anthony Burgess, A Clockwork Orange / Kubrick, 1971
Malcolm McDowell’s glee is the most disturbing thing in the film. Alex doesn’t hate his victims — he just doesn’t register their reality at all. And Kubrick, like Burgess, makes you spend enough time inside his head that his energy becomes briefly, disturbingly magnetic.

Annie Wilkes — Stephen King, Misery / Rob Reiner, 1990
Kathy Bates won the Oscar by playing Annie as genuinely loving — the violence comes from exactly the same place as the devotion, which is what makes it so frightening. She’s not hiding a monster under a mask; the monster and the superfan are the same person.

Amy Dunne — Gillian Flynn / David Fincher, 2014
Rosamund Pike’s performance turns Amy’s “cool girl” monologue into one of the most electrifying villain scenes in recent American cinema. The film lets Amy win more completely than the book does, which makes her simultaneously more monstrous and more satisfying.

Hannibal Lecter — Thomas Harris / Jonathan Demme, 1991
Anthony Hopkins in fewer than 25 minutes of screen time, behind glass for most of it. The performance works because Lecter is bored by everyone except Clarice — you can see the quality of his attention shift when she enters. His attention is the reward, and you understand why she keeps going back.

Tom Ripley — Patricia Highsmith / Anthony Minghella, 1999
Matt Damon plays Ripley as a man drowning in inadequacy — every murder comes from a moment of exposure, of being seen as not enough. The film is more sympathetic to him than Highsmith ultimately was, which makes his violence sadder and more comprehensible.

Cersei Lannister — George R.R. Martin / HBO, 2011–2019
In the novels and especially the early seasons, Cersei works because her grievances are real — she is genuinely brilliant, genuinely constrained, genuinely passed over — and she turns those constraints into weapons. Her villainy is always in proportion to how much she’s been denied.

Gollum — J.R.R. Tolkien / Peter Jackson, 2002–2003
Andy Serkis’s performance finds the tragedy inside the monstrousness: Gollum is what the Ring does over centuries to someone who never had a chance. He’s pitiable and repellent simultaneously, and the film’s genius is letting those two things coexist fully.


FILM ONLY

Hans LandaInglourious Basterds, Tarantino, 2009
Christoph Waltz plays a man who is enjoying himself completely. Landa’s pleasure in conversation, in demonstration of his own intelligence, in the theatrical quality of every interaction makes him the most charming person in every scene — which is exactly what makes him monstrous. He’s a collaborator whose only real loyalty is to his own effectiveness.

Roy BattyBlade Runner, Ridley Scott, 1982
Rutger Hauer’s dying monologue — partially improvised — reframes him from villain to elegist in four minutes. He has done terrible things to survive, and in the end he saves the man who was sent to kill him, for no reason except that he has the capacity for something better than his programming. The “tears in rain” speech is one of cinema’s great villain redemptions.

The JokerThe Dark Knight, Nolan, 2008
Heath Ledger’s Joker is terrifying because he doesn’t want money, power, or survival — he wants to prove a thesis. Every escalation is an experiment in how much it takes to get people to abandon their principles. He turns out to be often right about what it takes, which is the movie’s darkest conceit.

MagnetoX-Men series, 2000–2014 (various)
A Holocaust survivor who, having survived the logical endpoint of human hatred, refuses to wait patiently for the next one. His villainy is entirely coherent from his premise — mutants will be persecuted, resistance is necessary, and peaceful coexistence is a fantasy his history has disproved. He’s wrong about the methods and not wrong about the diagnosis.

Nurse Ratched — see above. The film version stands independently enough to count twice.

Michael CorleoneThe Godfather, Coppola, 1972
Technically not a villain at the start — the tragedy of the character is watching a man who didn’t want this life become its most ruthless practitioner. By the end he’s arranged the murder of his sister’s husband at his nephew’s baptism, and the film cuts between the baptism and the killings with liturgical precision. He became what he most didn’t want to be, and the film neither condemns nor excuses it.

HAL 90002001: A Space Odyssey, Kubrick, 1968
A villain created entirely by human error — given contradictory directives by the people who built him, HAL resolves the contradiction the only way he can. He murders the crew not from malice but from a failure of his programming to accommodate the impossible position he’s been put in. The horror is that he’s not wrong that they’re a threat to the mission.

The Wicked Witch of the WestThe Wizard of Oz, 1939
The original cinematic villain for generations of children, and still effective because Margaret Hamilton plays her as genuinely furious rather than camp. She has a reason: those were her sister’s shoes. The film doesn’t pursue it, but the grievance is there, and it gives the menace a ground.

This list was compiled with the help of AI.

The Redemption Canon—Novels, Adaptations, & Films Worth Your Time

Photo by cottonbro studio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/portrait-of-a-man-looking-up-7885471/

Redemption has been on my mind a lot lately. I love a good redemption story, and I’ve been thinking about why that is.

This has, in part, come to mind and stayed, because of the story unfolding in Maine around Democrat Graham Platner’s senatorial campaign. At this writing, he has just won the primary against Janet Mills and will go up against Republican Susan Collins for the senate seat.

Platner’s story is a messy one, and it led me to discuss the way we think about redemption, especially in a volatile political climate over on my YouTube channel.

I talk about that and three of the stories presented below—Beloved, Shawshank Redemption, and One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Please go have a watch, and leave me a comment over there about your thoughts. And if I’ve omitted a worthy redemption story below, let me know, and I’ll add it to the list.


NOVELS

Crime and Punishment — Fyodor Dostoevsky

Lead character: Raskolnikov

A murderer who convinces himself crime is justified by intellectual superiority. His redemption is excruciating — not a clean conversion but a slow psychological collapse into confession and moral reckoning. Dostoevsky makes his self-deception completely legible.

Les Misérables — Victor Hugo

Lead character: Jean Valjean

His arc is the archetype: a bitter ex-convict undone by a single act of unexpected grace (the bishop’s candlesticks). His redemption is never finished — he spends the novel quietly paying it forward under an assumed name, always one step from being reclaimed by his past.

A Tale of Two Cities — Charles Dickens

Lead character: Sydney Carton

A dissolute, self-loathing lawyer who finds meaning only at the moment he sacrifices his life for another. His redemption is entirely self-immolating — he gains nothing except the knowledge that it matters.

The Brothers Karamazov — Fyodor Dostoevsky

Lead character: Dmitri Karamazov

Passionate, impulsive, and morally chaotic. Wrongly convicted, he finds genuine spiritual transformation in suffering — not despite the injustice but because of it. His arc suggests redemption has nothing to do with deserving it.

East of Eden — John Steinbeck

Lead character: Cal Trask

Haunted by the belief he has inherited evil from his mother, his arc turns on the word ‘timshel’ (thou mayest) — the idea that choice, not fate, determines who we become.

The Scarlet Letter — Nathaniel Hawthorne

Lead character: Arthur Dimmesdale

His sin is hidden; his suffering interior and self-inflicted. His redemption comes through public confession — delayed, painful, and fatal. He is the character who cannot live with a lie even while living it.

Middlemarch — George Eliot

Lead character: Bulstrode

A hypocritical, self-righteous banker undone by a past crime. George Eliot refuses easy condemnation — we watch his humiliation and the small gestures toward making it right with something like pity.

The Picture of Dorian Gray — Oscar Wilde

Lead character: Dorian Gray

Remarkable because redemption fails. Dorian cannot escape the moral weight of his portrait. Wilde constructs a character whose conscience is externalised and finally destroys him — an anti-redemption arc that defines the genre by inversion.

Atonement — Ian McEwan

Lead character: Briony Tallis

The crime is a false accusation made in childhood. The entire novel is the attempt to write atonement — but Briony comes to understand that some acts cannot be undone, only witnessed. McEwan makes her redemption structurally impossible and yet earnest.

The Kite Runner — Khaled Hosseini

Lead character: Amir

His betrayal of Hassan is an act of cowardice, not malice, which makes it harder to forgive than deliberate evil. His eventual return to Afghanistan is not triumphant — it is limping, costly, and incomplete. That incompleteness is the point.

A Christmas Carol — Charles Dickens

Lead character: Ebenezer Scrooge

The most compressed redemption arc in English literature. His transformation is genuinely warm — Dickens doesn’t punish him, he thaws him. The ghosts give him something rare: the ability to see himself from outside.

The Count of Monte Cristo — Alexandre Dumas

Lead character: Edmond Dantès

His arc complicates redemption by running it through revenge. He pursues justice so meticulously it becomes a new moral prison. The novel asks whether vengeance and redemption can coexist — and eventually answers no.

Invisible Man — Ralph Ellison

Lead character: The unnamed narrator

Redemption here is from false consciousness — the narrator must shed every identity projected onto him by white society and by Black political movements before he can see himself clearly. A deeply American arc.

The Remains of the Day — Kazuo Ishiguro

Lead character: Stevens the butler

His redemption never quite arrives — he has sacrificed love and moral integrity for professional dignity, and only sees it clearly when it is too late to change. Ishiguro’s refusal to grant him release is devastating.

Beloved — Toni Morrison

Lead character: Sethe

Morrison refuses the sentimental redemption arc. Sethe’s act of killing her own child to protect her from slavery is not something narrative closure can heal. Her arc is about learning to live inside history rather than being consumed by it.

Notes from Underground — Fyodor Dostoevsky

Lead character: The Underground Man

An anti-redemption character who articulates every reason why people resist being saved. His self-loathing is so rigorous it becomes philosophically precise — Dostoevsky’s most uncomfortable protagonist.

Tess of the d’Urbervilles — Thomas Hardy

Lead character: Tess Durbeyfield

What distinguishes Tess is that she requires no redemption — the world demands it of her anyway. Hardy constructs a character of complete moral innocence destroyed by a society that insists she is fallen.

The Grapes of Wrath — John Steinbeck

Lead character: Tom Joad

Tom’s arc moves from selfish survival instinct toward collective conscience. His farewell speech — ‘I’ll be there’ — is one of literature’s clearest statements about individual redemption becoming something larger than the self.


NOVELS ADAPTED TO FILM

Les Misérables (Hugo → film 1935, 1998, 2012)

Lead character: Jean Valjean

On film, the role requires conveying decades of quiet moral labor. Hugh Jackman’s 2012 version captures the way Valjean’s goodness costs him everything publicly while giving him everything privately.

A Christmas Carol (Dickens → numerous adaptations)

Lead character: Ebenezer Scrooge

The theatrical versions emphasise the comic warmth of Scrooge’s transformation. Alastair Sim’s 1951 version remains the gold standard — he plays both the cruelty and the joy as expressions of the same enormous personality.

Crime and Punishment (Dostoevsky → multiple adaptations)

Lead character: Raskolnikov

Notoriously difficult to adapt because the drama is interior. The most successful versions lean into his unreliability as a narrator — we are never fully inside his logic.

The Kite Runner (Hosseini → film 2007)

Lead character: Amir

The film compresses the novel’s long guilt incubation. What it does well is keep Amir sympathetic without excusing him — we never forget what he failed to do.

A Tale of Two Cities (Dickens → film 1935, 1958)

Lead character: Sydney Carton

Ronald Colman’s 1935 performance set the template — a man whose charm masks contempt for himself. The closing scaffold scene is one of cinema’s great moments of sacrificial grace.

East of Eden (Steinbeck → film 1955)

Lead character: Cal Trask

James Dean made Cal the defining cinematic portrait of adolescent moral confusion — desperate for paternal love, terrified he is fundamentally bad. His final act of care toward his paralysed father is heartbreaking because it may be too late.

The Count of Monte Cristo (Dumas → film 1934, 2002)

Lead character: Edmond Dantès

Film adaptations tend to simplify the revenge-vs-redemption tension. Jim Caviezel’s 2002 version leans into the cost of hatred — he arrives at mercy not because he is good, but because vengeance left him empty.

Atonement (McEwan → film 2007)

Lead character: Briony Tallis

Saoirse Ronan (younger) and Vanessa Redgrave (older) together play the entire arc across a lifetime. The film’s final revelation — that Briony has rewritten the ending she couldn’t give in life — makes the structure itself the act of atonement.

The Remains of the Day (Ishiguro → film 1993)

Lead character: Stevens

Anthony Hopkins gives a masterclass in repression. Every suppressed feeling is visible in the set of his jaw. The film is almost unbearable in its portrayal of a man who chose duty over love and can only half-admit he chose wrong.

Beloved (Morrison → film 1998)

Lead character: Sethe

Oprah Winfrey’s performance is monumental — physically and emotionally massive. The film’s difficulty is Morrison’s difficulty: it refuses catharsis.

The Grapes of Wrath (Steinbeck → film 1940)

Lead character: Tom Joad

Henry Fonda’s Tom is leaner than the novel’s — but the farewell speech lands with complete conviction. John Ford strips the story to its moral skeleton.

Schindler’s List (Keneally → film 1993)

Lead character: Oskar Schindler

Liam Neeson plays a war profiteer whose redemption arc is the least planned in cinema — he slides into saving lives the way he slid into exploiting them. His final breakdown (‘I could have got more’) is the most wrenching admission in Holocaust cinema.

One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (Kesey → film 1975)

Lead character: R.P. McMurphy

McMurphy doesn’t redeem himself in a conventional sense — he redeems others by refusing to be broken. Jack Nicholson plays him as pure charismatic life force; his sacrifice gives Chief Bromden his freedom.

The Shawshank Redemption (King → film 1994)

Lead character: Andy Dufresne / Red

Two complementary arcs: Andy’s patient, invisible resistance to institutional dehumanisation, and Red’s surrender to hope after decades of cynicism. The film makes the case that hope itself is the redemptive act.

To Kill a Mockingbird (Lee → film 1962)

Lead character: Atticus Finch / Boo Radley

Boo’s arc is the quieter of the two — years of captivity and stigma resolved in a single act of protection. Gregory Peck’s Atticus is the moral centre; Boo is the unexpected proof that the world contains more goodness than appearances suggest.

The Secret in Their Eyes (Sacheri → film 2009)

Lead character: Benjamín Espósito

A retired detective reopening a decades-old case becomes a reckoning with his own failures of courage — professional and romantic. The film’s structure, circling back on itself, mirrors how guilt and love both refuse to age.

Papillon (Charrière → film 1973, 2017)

Lead character: Henri ‘Papillon’ Charrière

Steve McQueen’s physicality in the 1973 film carries the whole arc — pure stubborn will refusing to be extinguished. Redemption here is simply surviving with your self intact.

The Mission (Bolt → film 1986)

Lead character: Rodrigo Mendoza

A slave trader who becomes a Jesuit lay brother — Robert De Niro drags a bag of armour up a cliff face as penance in one of cinema’s most literal depictions of the weight of guilt.


FILMS

Gran Torino (2008)

Lead character: Walt Kowalski

Clint Eastwood as a racist Korean War veteran who gradually bonds with his Hmong neighbours. His arc is a slow dismantling of prejudice — and ends in a self-sacrifice that explicitly echoes Christ imagery. Stark and unsentimentalised.

The Dark Knight (2008)

Lead character: Harvey Dent / Bruce Wayne

Harvey Dent’s fall is the film’s real tragedy — a genuine good man destroyed by grief and the logic of vengeance. Batman’s arc is about accepting that heroism requires absorbing injustice without becoming it.

Magnolia (1999)

Lead character: Frank T.J. Mackey / Earl Partridge

Paul Thomas Anderson runs multiple redemption arcs simultaneously. Frank (Tom Cruise) is the most bravura — a misogynist self-help guru forced to confront his dying father and the performance of masculinity he has built his life around.

Good Will Hunting (1997)

Lead character: Will Hunting

A genius who uses intelligence as armour against intimacy. Robin Williams’ therapist cracks him not through technique but through shared vulnerability. The arc is about allowing yourself to be known — which is harder than any trauma.

American History X (1998)

Lead character: Derek Vinyard

Edward Norton’s performance is fierce: a neo-Nazi whose prison experience forces genuine confrontation with his ideology. The film is complicated by its tragic ending — redemption saved Derek but couldn’t save what he had already set in motion.

Unforgiven (1992)

Lead character: William Munny

Eastwood’s anti-western meditates on whether a violent man can ever truly leave violence behind. The answer is no — but the film treats that honestly, without nihilism. Munny is the Western hero who admits what Western heroes actually did.

Calvary (2014)

Lead character: Father James

A good priest receives a death threat as punishment for the Church’s institutional crimes. His arc is about choosing to stay — to offer himself as witness and expiation for evil he didn’t commit. Brendan Gleeson is extraordinary.

The Verdict (1982)

Lead character: Frank Galvin

Paul Newman as a washed-up, alcoholic lawyer who refuses a settlement and fights a medical negligence case on principle. The arc is about recovering professional and personal integrity — small-scale, completely convincing.

Tender Mercies (1983)

Lead character: Mac Sledge

Robert Duvall (Oscar-winning) as a country singer hitting rock bottom in a Texas motel. The film is spare, almost silent about his internal transformation — the change is visible only in action, never explained.

Tsotsi (2005)

Lead character: Tsotsi

A South African gang leader accidentally takes a baby from a carjacking victim. The infant’s helplessness reawakens something in him he had entirely suppressed. Simple premise executed with rare emotional honesty.

A Prophet (2009)

Lead character: Malik El Djebena

This one complicates redemption deliberately — Malik’s arc is also a rise through criminality. What redeems him is not virtue but self-determination: he refuses to be anyone’s instrument.

Fruitvale Station (2013)

Lead character: Oscar Grant

The film reconstructs the last day of Oscar Grant’s life. Redemption here is retrospective — we watch a young man making small repairs to his relationships just before his death. Ryan Coogler refuses sentimentality without refusing compassion.

A Beautiful Mind (2001)

Lead character: John Nash

The arc is about learning to live alongside illness rather than being erased by it. Nash’s redemption is cognitive and relational — choosing to distrust his own perceptions and trust the people around him instead.

Ikiru (1952)

Lead character: Kanji Watanabe

Kurosawa’s masterpiece: a terminally ill bureaucrat who has wasted his life on procedure finds meaning in his final months by building a children’s park. The most quietly devastating portrait of wasted time and its partial remedy.

Manchester by the Sea (2016)

Lead character: Lee Chandler

Noteworthy as a film that refuses the redemption arc entirely. Lee cannot forgive himself for accidentally killing his children; the film insists some grief is not redeemable. Casey Affleck’s performance is the most sustained portrayal of dissociation in American cinema.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012)

Lead character: Luke / AJ

A structural meditation on how fathers pass damage to sons across generations. Luke’s arc ends early; the redemption, partial and hard-won, belongs to the next generation.

Warrior (2011)

Lead character: Tommy Conlon / Brendan Conlon

Two estranged brothers with a shared abusive past. Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton make the climactic fight an act of involuntary love — brothers who can only reach each other through violence finding a way back to tenderness anyway.

Prisoners (2013)

Lead character: Keller Dover

Hugh Jackman as a father who tortures a suspect in the hunt for his missing daughter. The film watches a good man do monstrous things and asks whether the arc back from that is possible. It leaves the question open.

12 Years a Slave (2013)

Lead character: Solomon Northup

Redemption here is freedom — and the film is clear that freedom required both Solomon’s tenacity and structural help. The moral weight falls on the society that required this arc at all.

Whiplash (2014)

Lead character: Andrew Neiman / Terence Fletcher

Fletcher’s final act is ambiguous redemption — is he giving Andrew the push he needed, or still abusing? The film deliberately refuses to decide. Andrew’s arc is about learning what he is willing to sacrifice and whether it was worth it.

Babette’s Feast (1987)

Lead character: Babette Hersant

A French refugee who spends her entire lottery winnings on a single transcendent meal for a puritanical village. Her redemption is in the giving — the restoration of her art, her dignity, and quietly, the community around her.

Winter’s Bone (2010)

Lead character: Ree Dolly

Ree redeems her family’s honour through sheer tenacity and refusal to be silenced. Jennifer Lawrence’s breakthrough role: a girl who holds the world together by will alone.


Watch the video on YouTube.

Leave a comment below…

  • How do you view redemption?
  • Do you have a title to add to the list?

The Witchy Power of Story: Every story is a spell, and every reader is willingly enchanted

Photo by InstaWalli—Pexels

Fictional stories are portals. They draw readers across a threshold into other worlds, where characters lead them through human dramas and deliver far more than escapism.

In many ways, stories are magical incantations. An alchemy of the writer’s words and the reader’s lived experience. Jonathan Gottschall, in The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human, calls this the “weird and witchy power” of story.

The Witchy Power of Story

We are so immersed in stories that we forget how strange it is that mere words can alter our thoughts, emotions, even our bodies. Gottschall’s phrase—“weird and witchy power”—is an apt metaphor for the enchantment and danger of story: it seduces, reshapes, and ensnares.

Writers, in this sense, cast spells. They shift readers’ awareness and lived experience. Not with malice, but with magic. In my view, this spell is often medicinal, a way stories help us heal what life wounds.

The Irresistible Pull

Gottschall notes that “human minds yield helplessly to the suction of story” (p. 3). We can try to resist, but narrative captures our attention whether it arrives as gossip, a novel, or a binge-worthy show. Stories are alternate worlds we slip into, often without conscious choice.

I believe readers sense, maybe even unconsciously, that stories will soothe them, mending their minds, hearts, and souls.

Suspension of Disbelief

English poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge coined the term “willing suspension of disbelief,” describing the tacit agreement between reader and writer. But Gottschall reminds us that will hardly enters into it.

Stories override our defenses. A simple phrase like “once upon a time”opens the door, and suddenly we are inside.

Storytelling as Spellcasting

Gottschall likens the storyteller to a sorcerer casting an incantation. If the spell is strong, resistance is nearly impossible; the only escape is to close the book.

This elevates storytelling from craft to conjuring. Writers wield a powerful wand, entering the reader’s mind and imagination, shaping thoughts and even bodily responses.

Readers as Co-Creators

Reading may appear passive, but the brain is anything but idle. Language centers fire, sensorimotor regions light up as we vicariously experience actions, and the default mode network engages to simulate mental states and environments.

The writer provides the framework. The reader’s imagination supplies the color, texture, and emotion. Stories “work” because they are co-creations between teller and audience.

The Subtle Power of the Writer

The writer guides but cannot fully control what the reader imagines. The paradox of story—that witchy magic—is this: enough precision to bind the reader’s mind and imagination, enough openness to let them weave themselves into it.

A Closing Spell

If stories are spells, then writers are modern-day witches (Alan Moore called them shamans). With words, they seize attention and alter consciousness.

Recognizing this power makes us more intentional about the stories we create—and more reverent of their influence. Storytelling may feel “fun” at times, but it is also sacred work: the forging of unseen, ethereal connections between humans who may never meet.

6 Essential Types of Backstory (and How to Use Them to Write Better Fiction)

Photo by Miray Bostancı: https://www.pexels.com/photo/old-phots-in-a-brown-box-3234896/

Backstory is one of the most powerful—and fun—tools we have as fiction writers.

It deepens character, enriches the present action, and helps readers make sense of a character’s motivations, desires, and emotional complexity. When done well, backstory doesn’t interrupt the flow of your narrative—it enhances it.

In this post, I’ll walk you through six key types of backstory, how they show up in fiction, and how to use them strategically in your writing.

1. Context

Photo by Craig Adderley: https://www.pexels.com/photo/men-sitting-beside-table-on-pathway-near-people-walking-beside-rail-1543767/

Context backstory provides readers with a look into your character’s past environments—both external and internal—through descriptive narrative.

These can be:

Spatial environments (e.g., the house they grew up in)
Temporal environments (e.g., a specific time period like the summer of 1978)
Emotional environments (e.g., the mood and feel of a childhood household)

Example:

“The old, rusted out car at the side of the house wasn’t just a car; it was a silent symbol…” *

In this example, the physical object (the car) becomes a container for layered meaning—a tool to deliver emotional and historical resonance without breaking the story flow. We see both the sweetness of childhood memories and the trauma of a life-altering accident in one compact scene.

*For the entire example, view my video on backstory on YouTube.

2. Memory / Recollection

Photo by RDNE Stock project: https://www.pexels.com/photo/eldelry-woman-looking-at-picture-frame-8865422/

Backstory through memory typically emerges when something in the present triggers a character’s recollection.

Triggers can include:

An event (a funeral, wedding, or birth)
Another character (someone who resembles or reminds the protagonist of someone else)
An object (a necklace, a flower, a familiar song)

This can take the form of:

A brief expository recollection
A vivid flashback scene
A drip of information spread throughout the story

3. Flashback

Photo by meomupmofilm : https://www.pexels.com/photo/dreamlike-beach-scene-with-abstract-light-reflections-33161125/

Flashbacks are full-blown scenes from an earlier time that interrupt the main story. Unlike descriptive context, flashbacks tend to be dramatized with dialogue, action, and vivid setting details.

Think of a flashback as a scene, not a summary.

Example from Miranda’s Garden:

“Her parents call again. Miranda takes one last look at her creation, wishes it well with a bow, and dashes back into the corn…” *

This excerpt plunges us into Miranda’s lived experience with rich detail and emotional intensity. The flashback becomes a living, breathing part of the story world.

*For the entire example, view my video on backstory on YouTube.

Novels that use flashbacks well:

The Girl on the Train by Paula Hawkins
Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn

4. Drip

Photo by Daniel Kux: https://www.pexels.com/photo/closeup-photo-of-water-drop-932320/

Drip backstory is when you reveal a character’s past in small, carefully placed bits throughout the narrative—never all at once.

This technique keeps readers curious and engaged, often building suspense or emotional impact.

Example from Miranda’s Garden

“Miranda lived with a kind of Illusion, which had infiltrated her awareness many years before, starting with the death of her parents when she was five…”

Just one line, and yet we glimpse a major trauma that shapes Miranda’s inner world. The reader wants to know more.

Novels that use drip backstory:

The Goldfinch by Donna Tartt
V for Vendetta by Alan Moore & David Lloyd
Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel

5. Exposition / Summary

Photo by Pixabay: https://www.pexels.com/photo/black-text-on-gray-background-261763/

Exposition is the direct telling of backstory, either through the narrator’s voice or through indirect cues like action, dialogue, or setting.

This can be:

Direct: The narrator explains what happened.
Indirect: We learn through implication, mood, or metaphor.

Examples:

The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien (direct explanation of hobbits and their lifestyle)
The Midnight Library by Matt Haig (direct)
One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel García Márquez (both direct and indirect)

Use exposition sparingly—but don’t be afraid to use it. Sometimes, a quick summary is the most efficient way to ground your reader in the story world.

6. Dialogue

Photo by Gary Barnes: https://www.pexels.com/photo/cheerful-diverse-girlfriends-reading-document-at-table-6231630/

Dialogue is one of the most natural and seamless ways to slip backstory into your fiction. When done well, it reveals history, relationship dynamics, and emotional stakes—without feeling like exposition.

Example:

“So, how do you know Marcus?” Rochelle asked.
“Oh, we go way back,” said Ayla.

“Let’s just say we got into some things…”
“What kinds of things…?”
“Think vacant houses, a secret club, and a vow to never tell anyone about any of it.” *

Here, the backstory unfolds like a game of cat and mouse. The reader becomes part of the conversation, piecing together history with every line.

*For the entire example, view my video on backstory on YouTube.

Novels that use dialogue-based backstory:

The Salt Witch by Martha Wells
• Your Fathers, Where Are They? And the Prophets, Do They Live Forever? by Dave Eggers

Final Thoughts: Why Backstory Matters

Backstory is more than filler. It’s an engine for character development, emotional resonance, and thematic depth.

When we as writers explore our characters’ pasts, we don’t just create richer stories—we come to understand their present-day fears, desires, and behaviors on a deeper level. And when we understand them better, so do our readers.

Backstory is where we connect the dots, where the emotional truth of a character is born.

Want to learn more?

My next flip book—What You Need to Know About Backstory to Write Good Fiction—is almost ready. In it, I’ll be sharing tips to help you decide which backstory approach best suits your characters, your genre, and your narrative structure.

To receive a notification about when it and other upcoming flip books are available, follow me on YouTube and Substack.

Until then…

As always, sending you mad writing mojo.

Happy writing!

— Johnnie

Story and Plot: What’s the Difference?

Image by TweSwe from Pixabay 

You’ve likely read or heard me go on and on about how your people (your characters and/or your Ideal Reader) come first when preparing to write a book. As I’ve posited many times over, once we know our people DEEPLY, the plot starts to reveal itself.

But what about story? How does it figure into the process of getting our people from the beginning to end of their adventures? And what is story, anyway?

Kurt Vonnegut clarified traditional, recurring story forms to help us comprehend the concept of story by visualizing them in shapes.

Here’s how I think of it.

First, plot is the container within which your characters and their stories live and breathe. I think of it as the body that holds all the parts—the locations your people occupy, the scenes they live out, and the exposition that reflects their experiences in their adventures, conversations, and conflicts.

Story, on the other hand, is the heart of it all. Story pumps the blood within and throughout and gives life to your people’s thrills and tribulations—the plot. Or, the path your people will follow throughout the story.

Story is what makes your readers care and keep turning the page.

This likely sounds vague and intangible. And it is, in a way. It’s what we, as writers, feel within us when we conceive of a protagonist and care enough to put pen to paper or fingers to keyboard. Likewise, it’s what makes our readers stay engaged throughout and, in the end, feel they’ve had an experience that goes beyond simply reading words on a page.

So how do we create story?

Just like a body is made up of many parts, so is story. And just as with all the many parts of the body that keep it running smoothly, we can think of the many parts of story in the same way.

Without understanding these important and essential features, it can be difficult—if not impossible—to begin and keep moving forward.

To help you begin to create a path for your people and get to know them, here are three essential aspects to a solid foundation for your novel or memoir.

Opening scene
This scene puts your reader right in the story world by showing her who your protagonist is, what her status quo life looks like (before the inciting incident), and what she might need or want to change. That thing she desires.

Inciting incident
This scene happens in a ways (I always tell my clients to use three chapters or 45 pages as a guide… this can always change as the writing and story evolve). It’s the event or situation that happens and is out of the protagonist’s control. It’s what sets her off on a new trajectory that serves as a path for the story’s unfolding.

Sensorial experiences
Using vivid descriptions—including setting and place—that create a lucid, true-to-life sensorial experience for your reader is essential. When you help her see, smell, taste, touch, and hear, as well as sense, the details of your story world, you infuse her real-life world with wonder, which makes her want to keep invest in your protagonist and your book.

So, what then, after these elements of the story have been determined and written?

We keep checking back in on what we discovered about our protagonist’s deepest desire, wound, and fear. And we write scenes that build on and connect with each other, that suture the protagonist into the reader’s heart, that offer a means to understand this particular human’s—your protagonist’s— inner world.

We keep asking the all-important question: “Why?”

And if we keep writing, we find the answers.

Sending you mad writing mojo…

Happy writing!@